>I fail to see how saying that one likes replacing callbacks with channels translates to saying Go is "perfection incarnate". It isn't. It is saying "I don't

>I fail to see how saying that one likes replacing callbacks with channels translates to saying Go is "perfection incarnate". It isn't. It is saying "I don't realize that this is actually worse than what lots of languages provided before go even existed, so I think it is awesome". Which is the point of the blub response. Go isn't interesting, it is blub.