It's not that no one "should" be compelled. The constitution states that no one "can" be compelled. Huge difference. "Should" implies choice. There is no choice

It's not that no one "should" be compelled. The constitution states that no one "can" be compelled. Huge difference. "Should" implies choice. There is no choice here. I hope the court sees this as a circumstance where the person is being compelled to be a witness against himself. I like laws that protect individual citizens (and I mean actual living, breathing entities and not that BS 'businesses are people, my friend'). So, I agree with you... Just a bit more firm and by the book. :-)