4 ms·
Isn't it interesting that you are commenting on a comment __with__ sources, while providing none yourself. After I make a tongue in cheek comment to your comme
by JanezStupar 13y ago
Isn't it interesting that you are commenting on a comment __with__ sources, while providing none yourself.
After I make a tongue in cheek comment to your comment. You flail more rethoric at me, demanding sources from me (?).
You also accuse me of trying to invert the burden of proof, while like I said you haven't really offered a source.
Here is a source for you: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
- onli 13y agoThat is not what I wanted to do. Thing is: The article cited is spotty in that regard, I pointed that out (you don't need sources for that) and I didn't and still don't understand your answer to that comment of mine. I don't want to discuss meta nor personal, so that's it for me.
- JanezStupar 13y agoSee It is hard to take any of your statements seriously as your reading comprehension is so bad, that you don't even notice that you are arguing with the wrong guy.
- onli 13y agoYou don't know what reading comprehension means. Hint: Remembering a small username not even visible when replying to a comment deeper down in a thread has nothing to do with it.
- JanezStupar 13y agoIndeed if all you care about is hearing your own voice it doesn't really matter what you are saying or to whom you are saying it.