3 ms·
The "cost" of decommissioning is in the destruction of production capacity. If you decommission a plant that has 20 years at 800MW lifetime yet, it's not the fi
by mseebach 13y ago
The "cost" of decommissioning is in the destruction of production capacity. If you decommission a plant that has 20 years at 800MW lifetime yet, it's not the fixed amount to actually demolish the plant that's the problem (this money is, as you correctly say, already set aside for this purpose), it's the cost of getting those 20y x 800MW from somewhere else, both in purely financial terms, but also environmental: The only way Germany can replace their nuclear capacity is with coal and gas.
- antr 13y agoYou are 100% correct. My comment did focus on the financial cost, but your "cost" implying a change in the generation mix towards CO2 emitting technologies is probably a far bigger one. Thanks for bringing this up.