3 ms·
There are far more software project starts than good names out there. I doubt that. Define 'good name'. Also, for open source software it does not matter that
by dgesang 13y ago
There are far more software project starts than good names out there.
I doubt that. Define 'good name'. Also, for open source software it does not matter that much what it is named. Who would care if Python was named e.g. Snake or Juice or Foo? As long as it is somewhat unique and catchy it should be fine, shouldn't it?
You don't know which category your project will end up in when you start it.
Exactly, you do not know it. If your product is successful you want it to be unique. Just imagine the number of wrong tags on SE. And if you product is not successful it is even worse to add unnecessary confusion.
Because JS is popular
Surprisingly and unfortunately, yes. But other technologies have had their time as well, e.g. I can't remember any ambiguous naming in Java. Anyone?
There are also a lot of half-baked libraries out there that will waste your time. So many developers end up making their own.
Ok, why not just name it jQuery then? Hardly an excuse for poor naming choice.
- marshray 13y ago> I doubt that. Define 'good name'. A good name is pronoucable, spellable, memorable. Common English words can be good choices. Compare the number of common English words (thousands) with the number of Sourceforge, Github, Google Code, Codeplex, Bitbucket, etc. projects (millions). > Ok, why not just name it jQuery then? jQuery is a) perhaps the world's most popular project in the domain of Javascript libraries, and b) not a proper English word. 'Derby' is a relatively common English word and two Derby projects are in mildly different domains. I don't personally know of anyone using either project (unlike of course 'jQuery').