Stackless is the opposite of what he wants The quote above does mention that "[Stackless] does not however allow you to take advantage of multi-core or multi-p

Stackless is the opposite of what he wants The quote above does mention that "[Stackless] does not however allow you to take advantage of multi-core or multi-processor resources. It simply allows you to squeeze the most amount of work out of a single threaded process...". Depending on the application and its particular implementation, actually Stackless could be the right solution. Which is why I brought it up. In fact, it now looks as though he might go with Stackless, just like EVE online did :)