3 ms·
In my experience it does not matter which tool is in hands of people who like to "tweak", "twist", "improve", etc. I've seen trac with "features", now I see JI
by Ingaz 13y ago
In my experience it does not matter which tool is in hands of people who like to "tweak", "twist", "improve", etc.
I've seen trac with "features", now I see JIRA with "features".
JIRA itself is not bad as issue tracker. (Trac also is not bad)
- fusiongyro 13y agoI think the core concept of Trac is great: automatic linking between issues, wiki pages and revisions. I think it suffers from being slow and difficult to install and configure, as well as using a very uncommon rendering engine that has really stymied theming. I use JIRA at work, and honestly it's completely fine. It's a goddamn bug tracker. If I can make bugs and close them it's doing its job. Nobody in my organization reads email or tracks their stuff anyway. Sometimes what you have are organizational/management problems, and no amount of wizzy technology is going to fix that.