3 ms·

You must have never used Rally? Because while I'm not a huge fan of JIRA (I've only used it in the past year so I don't know what it was like 4 years ago), I'v

• vyrotek 13y ago
  Heh, I did use Rally for a little bit at one company. Not long enough to form much of an opinion though. It was mostly a glorified bug tracker at that job. Some managers tried to actually enter the "stories" and "milestones". One system that I'm curious to try is called AtTask[0]. They're located here in Utah (just down the street from me!) and have quite the lineup of large customers. I don't personally know anyone who uses them though. [0] http://www.AtTask.com http://www.AtTask.com
• JoshTriplett 13y ago
  Funny, I've had the opposite experience; Rally has been mostly a joy to use, especially by comparison to Jira and Greenhopper.
• chrismorgan 13y ago
  Absolutely. I've had to use Rally for two years (haven't used it in the last five months, though). When I started using it, they didn't use URLs; it was a stateful app. Even now (well, five months ago) that's still often true... Also until recently, from Melbourne it took just under thirty seconds to load a page, any page, from scratch. Sending 2MB (for a while it was 4MB) of uncached JavaScript on every page load helped with that. Quite why one would use Ext 3, Ext 4, YUI and a couple of other libraries all on the same page, I don't know. Now, I think it's down to only about half a megabyte, and it's mostly cached. And I can just keep going on and on about it... JIRA is something where it can be configured well or poorly. Configured poorly, it's nasty. Configured well, it's enormously nicer than Rally can ever possibly be.
• icelancer 13y ago
  I had the opposite experience. I didn't mind Rally so much at all and hated JIRA.