4 ms·
A repurchase right can mean different things - you'd need to go to the specific language to really determine what it means. In the case of Sam Altman's founder
by gyardley 13y ago
A repurchase right can mean different things - you'd need to go to the specific language to really determine what it means.
In the case of Sam Altman's founder-friendly term sheet, what you're describing is covered by the 'ROFR/Co-Sale Agreement' section.
The repurchase right here refers to what happens if a founder leaves before their four-year vesting schedule is up - the company has the right to repurchase their unvested stock, almost certainly (although his term sheet doesn't specify) at the original near-zero issue price.
Since founders typically own 100% of their stock for tax purposes (hold it for a year, only have to pay long-term instead of short-term capital gains), the only way companies can subject founders to a vesting schedule is to have the option of buying the unvested portion back.
- jacquesm 13y agoIt all depends on who causes the leave, if the founder causes the leave I have no problem with such a repurchase right, but if the company causes the founder to leave (and this does happen) then the company should lose their repurchase right. Subtle stuff this.
- gyardley 13y agoSure, absolutely. The standard mechanism for this is accelerated vesting - I think Nivi wrote the definitive bit on it, here: http://venturehacks.com/articles/acceleration-termination http://venturehacks.com/articles/acceleration-termination