A few paragraphs down from Eisenhower's warning about the "military-industrial complex", we get this warning about the "scientific-technological elite": >"Toda

A few paragraphs down from Eisenhower's warning about the "military-industrial complex", we get this warning about the "scientific-technological elite": >"Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers. The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present -- and is gravely to be regarded. >Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite." Also: I get tired of seeing every vaguely technology-oriented Obama article here. There are plenty of places on the web to discuss them. What's the limit on the number of tech advisors he can appoint?