4 ms·
More unreliable than the hypothetical DNA vacuum cleaner? I'm sure if they can do that, they can come up with a more accurate lie detector test as well. I fin
by darkarmani 13y ago
More unreliable than the hypothetical DNA vacuum cleaner? I'm sure if they can do that, they can come up with a more accurate lie detector test as well.
I find check swabs invasive as well. If they can get the DNA in other ways that aren't invasive, I'm not sure why they have to be cleared to do it in this manner.
- tptacek 13y agoYes, much, much less reliable; this is like comparing blood chemical tests to phrenology.
- darkarmani 13y agoWhich one is like phrenology? ;) The DNA vacuum doesn't exist. I'm assuming if we had the ability to go around vacuuming people's DNA and testing all of it, we could have a more reliable lie detector test. And what do you mean unreliable? Maury Povich uses them all the time on his show! ;)