there should be a requirement to destroy the DNA if no conviction is attained. the fact that the gov't can store your fingerprints forever simply because someon

there should be a requirement to destroy the DNA if no conviction is attained. the fact that the gov't can store your fingerprints forever simply because someone accused you of something is insane to begin with. using this as further justification for DNA storage is misguided. your DNA is more private than your medical records, because much of the latter and a whole lot more can be decoded from your DNA, maybe not now, but it will most certainly be done in the future. "just give us the keys to your house, we'll only use them when we (or our associates) deem necessary"