A confirmation of fact is less relevant than peoples assumptions? What you seem to be suggesting is that information that people cannot be 100% sure of is perf

A confirmation of fact is less relevant than peoples assumptions? What you seem to be suggesting is that information that people cannot be 100% sure of is perfectly valid, and reasonable to base decisions on. But, when that information is confirmed to be true, that has not enough value to report. I simply do not understand or accept that way of thinking.