2 ms·
I look forward to the proposed solution. Because while I understand the arguments about simplifying the language and allowing for external garbage collectors, I
by jeltz 13y ago
I look forward to the proposed solution. Because while I understand the arguments about simplifying the language and allowing for external garbage collectors, I am not sure I am convinced that the GC type will be as simple to work with as the current built in GC:ed type. Sometimes you want to have GC when coding and as it is currently implemented in Rust it is easily accessible and simple to understand with readable code.