4 ms·
hmmm. what this really does is allow "unsafe" validation to be postponed until after the deck is used, when it no longer matters that the validation is unsafe.
by andrewcooke 13y ago
hmmm. what this really does is allow "unsafe" validation to be postponed until after the deck is used, when it no longer matters that the validation is unsafe.
which i guess is fair enough, but i was expecting some kind of homomorphic solution and/or a zero knowledge proof.
anyone have a solution that meets my finicky expectations?
- lann 13y agoEven better: it is possible for N players to fairly (safe from N-1 collusion) shuffle a deck with no central authority. The magic Google words are "mental poker". As you guessed, it involves homomorphic (or at least commutative) crypto.