4 ms·
The implication is that his test is a proof of C's merit. Merit is time-sensitive, in that if software is converted to another language, that language is more
by dylangs1030 13y ago
The implication is that his test is a proof of C's merit.
Merit is time-sensitive, in that if software is converted to another language, that language is more profitable/efficient for that software.
Therefore, the implication is also that systems converted to C demonstrate C's merit, because it's been decades since they were actually in the language you speak of.
- pjmlp 13y agoWhat can I say. I am older than C and remember the days when it was used only as the UNIX system's language. UNIX's success made people want to port UNIX's tooling for their home computers, this lead to the spread of C implementations outside UNIX. Had UNIX been written in language XYZ, the article would be called "Learn XYZ". Merit is relative.