5 ms·
> This happened in Germany some time ago. I don’t know to which event exactly you’re referring, but I can assure you that > 8h of warning or something similar
by claudius 13y ago
> This happened in Germany some time ago.
I don’t know to which event exactly you’re referring, but I can assure you that
> 8h of warning or something similar.
this is most certainly false. Could you elaborate a bit?
- claudius 13y agoCould someone explain why my comment about the likely falsehood of the claim that a third plebiscite was introduced less than 8 hours ahead on a holiday in Germany gets downvoted? o.O (Also note that practically all votes/plebiscites take place on Sundays in Germany so that as many people as possible can vote.)
- gcb0 13y agoOf course I took that out of my #$% :-) But there is a documentary about it... fairly recent one, I just can't find it knowing only that it was a park in Germany.
- claudius 13y agoPlebiscites in Germany are rather rare, and the only recent one I can think of is Stuttgart 21, where a train station was/is to be re-built. There was also only one plebiscite specifically about it, it was announced well in advance and it was won by those wanting to build the new station (which didn’t make the Green party that originally pressed for it particularly happy).
- gcb0 13y agoyou are correct. again, i said "moved the date or something" i don't quite remember the details, but remember that the oposition was complaining about something sneak that the majority party did. it may be that they used the fact that the oposition was wasting all their money with a "say no to stuttgart 21" and on the day of the referendum they worded it as "cancel the ongoing effort?"... i'd have to watch the documentary again to remember details :) but the idea is the same. even if you vote for your representatives for one reason or another, in the end, the party that ensure majority, gets to decide on the details.
- gcb0 13y agoyou are correct. again, i said "moved the date or something" i don't quite remember the details, but remember that the oposition was complaining about something sneak that the majority party did. it may be that they used the fact that the oposition was wasting all their money with a "say no to stuttgart 21" and on the day of the referendum they worded it as "cancel the ongoing effort?"... i'd have to watch the documentary again to remember details :) but the idea is the same. even if you vote for your representatives for one reason or another, in the end, the party that ensure majority, gets to decide on the details.
- zalew 13y agothey talk a bit about Stuttgart-21 in Urbanized