3 ms·
The approach and the phrasing seems exactly right to me and not at all off-putting. The goal of Brython is to replace javascript on the web, seems straightforw
by tinco 13y ago
The approach and the phrasing seems exactly right to me and not at all off-putting.
The goal of Brython is to replace javascript on the web, seems straightforward right? The way they go about it is to implement a compiler in javascript, and use that to bootstrap a python in the browser community. Seems like that is much easier than convincing Chrome/Firefox/IE to include a python compiler in their browser.
How would Brython replace javascript if it were precompiled on the server?
- redblacktree 13y agoWhy not provide both options, ala LESS?
- alexboots 13y agoBecause that takes time and effort and this is relatively new.
- redblacktree 13y agotinco seemed to be arguing that allowing server-side compilation would be harmful to the goals of the project. That's orthogonal to your argument about time and effort.