> Huh, that's almost like like saying "Where Visual Studio C++ succeeds over C". It's still on the inside, isn't it? It was a shady move on their part :-) The

> Huh, that's almost like like saying "Where Visual Studio C++ succeeds over C". It's still on the inside, isn't it? It was a shady move on their part :-) The comparison with Visual C++ isn't apt. Visual C++ for the most part is libraries over C++(not language core). People will complain either ways. When they were PLT Scheme, people cribbed about non-compliance with rnrs. Also, "it's still on the inside" has a threshold. Objective-C and C++ have C inside, but neither of them are C. Racket has added so much to r5rs that it should be considered a scheme derivative, and not a scheme.