3 ms·
Relatedly, if you watch the social climbers, they don't do a lot of real work. If you get even passably good at their game, you can get by with a couple hours o
by theorique 13y ago
Relatedly, if you watch the social climbers, they don't do a lot of real work. If you get even passably good at their game, you can get by with a couple hours of focused effort and that leaves 5-6 for self-directed learning. (Don't write code that you'll use later on work time-- you don't own that-- but feel free to explore and just rewrite the code from scratch at home.) Don't feel wrong about doing this; it's a crooked game and that makes criminals of everyone. Work is (for 95+ percent of people) just about advancing your career; the other shit is stuff people say to distract the naive and clueless.
This reads a lot like @vgr's description of the career trajectory of the so-called "Sociopath". More specifically, the transition from Loser to Sociopath.
http://www.ribbonfarm.com/the-gervais-principle/ http://www.ribbonfarm.com/the-gervais-principle/
- polarix 13y agoAnd a far richer and more thorough expose on the subject is @michaelochurch's Gervais-Macleod series. To whom you responded.
- theorique 13y agoNice - I must check it out then! edit: in case others are interested, that link is - https://michaelochurch.wordpress.com/2013/02/19/gervais-principle-questioned-macleods-hierarchy-the-technocrat-and-vc-startups/ https://michaelochurch.wordpress.com/2013/02/19/gervais-prin...