>The definition of pornography is "sexually explicit pictures, writing or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal" Which means image pr

>The definition of pornography is "sexually explicit pictures, writing or other material whose primary purpose is to cause sexual arousal" Which means image processing algorithms to detect "pornography" are doomed to failure, if they are tasked with determining the "purpose" of the image. (Maybe we'll get there someday, but we're many decades away from anything like that, I think.) What they're actually doing, it looks to me, is making nudity detectors -- which quite correctly flag artistic nudes. The article fails to make this distinction at all.