3 ms·
It's pretty easy to see how much of the performance drop is protocol overhead since the numbers are there for Tokyo Cabinet / Tyrant over the memcached protocol
by wheels 18y ago
It's pretty easy to see how much of the performance drop is protocol overhead since the numbers are there for Tokyo Cabinet / Tyrant over the memcached protocol and not.
This isn't terribly surprising. One is a distributed network protocol, the other is just moving things around in memory.
The poor performance for memcachedb doesn't surprise me a lot. In my tests I've found BDB (which it uses behind the scenes) to be frustratingly slow with writes.