4 ms·
If safeness cannot be guaranteed, then noone should be forced. Arguing with statistics over a population surely must sound cynical to those who have been negat
by lignuist 13y ago
If safeness cannot be guaranteed, then noone should be forced.
Arguing with statistics over a population surely must sound cynical to those who have been negatively affected by vaccination: "Sorry, you're one of the rare people we ignored while forcing everyone to take the medicine which is known to cause problems for 0.00001% of people."
Also, vaccination does not guarantee, that I cannot be an agent of the germ, even if I am imune myself.
- jlgreco 13y agoNobody is being forced to vaccinate under this proposal. They are only being opened up for liability if they choose not to vaccinate. If you want to endanger your child and others, then fine; just don't expect there to be no consequences. NOBODY is claiming that immunization is a guarantee; I don't know where you are getting that nonsense from.
- lignuist 13y agoTaxing is a way of enforcement, as well as telling people that they can get sued. Also, I never asked for the guarantee of immunization, but for guaranteed safety of vaccination. For example I know a child that lost ability to speak due to bad vaccination. Since it doesn't live in the US, it will never get compensation from a fund.
- jlgreco 13y agoSuch a guarantee would be unprecedented, and expecting it is ludicrous. You can get sued for many things that you cannot say you are "forced" to do.