3 ms·
That is extreme. If there is an alternative organic I buy it. This is good enough for me and I also buy a lot from my local organic farmer. I don't have to g
by jjm 13y ago
That is extreme.
If there is an alternative organic I buy it.
This is good enough for me and I also buy a lot from my local organic farmer.
I don't have to go to the extremes you mention, at all.
When I walk into a super market I just want choice.
Do I choose 100% non gmo? Most likely not, but I will if I had a choice.
Again, you might want to not associate that extremism with simple rational choice.
- smsm42 13y agoDo you have an idea where the seeds the farmer used came from? There the water came from? What is the chemical composition of the soil and which exactly chemicals in which quantities were put in it? Probably not. And it is never required to publish it. However, you require to publish data about using specific technology. Thus you single out this technology and stigmatize it, implying product using this technology is abnormal and substandard, and must be avoided. If the full knowledge was indeed important to you, you would solicit all the information above, but you do not. You want only information about specific technologies used, arbitrarily defined, for irrational reasons. It is fine, but the additional expense and regulatory hurdles you would impose on the producers because of this irrationality is not.