4 ms·
I think the second point was completely unnecessary. I didn't find it amusing or funny, just sarcastic. Yes, sarcastic, but not funny. I guess you consider wise
by piokuc 13y ago
I think the second point was completely unnecessary. I didn't find it amusing or funny, just sarcastic. Yes, sarcastic, but not funny. I guess you consider wise.io your competition, don't you?
- hermaj 13y agoSpeaking as someone with some years experience in ML to me there is a world of difference between the front page for wise.io and mynaweb.com (presuming these are the competing sites). The Myna page explicitly states it uses multi armed bandit algorithms, the algorithm fits the properties of the following claims. Wise's use of 'patent-pending', 'machine learning technology' and 'deploy machine intelligence' gives the impression of hiding shortcomings with jargon.
- noelwelsh 13y agoI don't think wise.io are competition for Myna. The tech does fairly different things, and I think we're targeting completely different markets. As for whether my comment was misplaced or not -- I guess that's up to the community to decide if they care to do such a thing. I do admit it was a bit snarky, but I also genuinely do find the titles a bit amusing. Tying in to another post on the front page right now, I do think that generalists are advantageous in early stage companies, and titles tend to be more appropriate with specialisation.