Not sure what they wanted to achieve with this article, as the article paints a picture different from the title. 1. Likelihood in long term remains the same.

Not sure what they wanted to achieve with this article, as the article paints a picture different from the title. 1. Likelihood in long term remains the same. (title betrays its readers) 2. In medium term likelihood of most extreme scenarios is less than what was expected. (hey ho, extreme scenarios are not to account for, thats why they are extreme) 3. people should be exactly as concerned as before about what climate change is doing ANyway, the whole news-article is based on one publication. Meh. I would rather ignore the details of one publication because minor difference in details dont matter. The broad picture remains the same.