4 ms·
More than 10 years after the IBM T220/T221 came out, but the IBM monitor still has a significantly bigger resolution (3840x2400) and PPI (203.98 vs 139.56).
by fdm 13y ago
More than 10 years after the IBM T220/T221 came out, but the IBM monitor still has a significantly bigger resolution (3840x2400) and PPI (203.98 vs 139.56).
- jtreminio 13y agoYes but the problem is its low refresh rate. If you're looking at static images, I'm sure it will do great, but if you are trying to watch a movie, play a game, or do anything that has fast motion, you won't have a good time.
- masklinn 13y agoMeanwhile the PQ321 has a refresh rate of ???.
- Torn 13y agoDisplayPort 1.2 should allow for 60hz: http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?p=4608199#post4608199 http://forums.guru3d.com/showthread.php?p=4608199#post460819... Gotta assume the monitor supports 60, going to 30 would be terrible.
- jfb 13y ago8ms, according to the OP.
- bestham 13y ago8ms is the panel switch rate, not the same as the slow refresh rate of the Lenovo due to the bottleneck in the interconnect with the GPU (4 DVI-channels and 41 Hz refresh, when the panel surly did 60 Hz). It is a massive datarate, especially for a 12 year old system.
- vadman 13y ago60 fps, but the current drivers for both AMD and Nvidia (still in development) make you connect 2 cables and essentially treat it like 2 1920x2160 displays from what I read.