3 ms·
Down-voted because this has nothing to do with the article, which is about the US sugar protectionism racket and not the health implications of HFCS.
by mratzloff 13y ago
Down-voted because this has nothing to do with the article, which is about the US sugar protectionism racket and not the health implications of HFCS.
- mattm 13y agoUnfortunately, I've noticed this is quite common on HN. The top comment is quite often some long discussion about some minor point of the article. I really wish HN would implement collapsed comments so I could choose to expand the discussion or just easily skip to the next ones which address the article directly.