Libelous and/or slanderous content wouldn't be made any more or less illegal by having or not having identifiable brands in stock photography. Despite the reac

Libelous and/or slanderous content wouldn't be made any more or less illegal by having or not having identifiable brands in stock photography. Despite the reactionary comments in this thread, we're not in a corporatist dystopia where it's against the law to publish a photograph of a ubiquitous consumer device.