3 ms·
1) Your response has nothing at all to do with my original point. 2) I didn't say you can do it easily, I said you CAN do it. 3) Yes and I can run decades old
by ebbv 13y ago
1) Your response has nothing at all to do with my original point.
2) I didn't say you can do it easily, I said you CAN do it.
3) Yes and I can run decades old UNIX software on OS X or Ubuntu. So what?
My point about debatable backwards compatibility is that some old DOS software does NOT work well in modern Windows. Some does, some doesn't. If you haven't experienced problems, lucky you.
4) You made my point for me here.
I'm not arguing any further, you're clearly a zealot, and have exactly the kind of attitude I was talking about.
- venomsnake 13y agoOn number 2 - you also cannot do it legally not only easily. The legality of jailbraiking is quite grey territory.
- raylu 13y ago> That if something is not 100%, exactly, totally, purely aligned to your personal vision it's fucking garbage, or worse, evil and bad. > I'm not arguing any further, you're clearly a zealot