15 ms·
>Our entire application is pretty small I think Well, I think most would agree that AngularJS has better readability and is more concise but a disclaimer would
by ojr 13y ago
>Our entire application is pretty small I think
Well, I think most would agree that AngularJS has better readability and is more concise but a disclaimer would be that I've been looking at Angular's syntax for quite some time and reactjs is a new framework...Instagram's website is nice by the way, simple, clean UI.
The "Load More" Button on the site is probably powered by reactjs? @peterhunt
- peterhunt 13y agoThere's a decent amount in there. We have client-side URL routing/transitions (thanks, Backbone) and the entire profile and feed pages are just big React components. There are also photo modals, login modals, and a full layer/tooltip system which is non-trivial to get right.
- robocat 13y agoFrom beginning of tutorial: > For our comment box example, we'll have the following component structure: >- CommentBox > - CommentList > - Comment > - CommentForm Yet the AngularJS solution simplifies this down to one component. If we presume React could simplify down to a single component too, then the AngularJS solution is would only be fair if it keeps the artificial constraint of having four component classes.