I'm against inconveniencing existing humans for the benefit of the environment, but arguing that trying to reduce human population increase is "hating humans" i

I'm against inconveniencing existing humans for the benefit of the environment, but arguing that trying to reduce human population increase is "hating humans" is like arguing that pro-choicers "hate babies". I mean, sure, let's look out for the humans that are already around. But I don't feel much obligation to destroy huge swathes of beautiful landscapes just so we can have more people. Quality of life over quantity of life, etc.