3 ms·
I'm not sure about that... Aesthetically it looks like something from 2005, and it's incredibly cluttered. The light blue and lack of underline on the result t
by wilg 13y ago
I'm not sure about that... Aesthetically it looks like something from 2005, and it's incredibly cluttered.
The light blue and lack of underline on the result titles makes it really difficult to read or skim them. The results are also vertically very close together. Sliding panels are weird, it feels like it's hiding relevant information. Three different fonts that don't go together. The two icons in the search box are different shades of gray. It doesn't feel like a website that an actual designer put together.
Also from the perspective of actually using this as a search engine, I can't really figure out what advantages there are over Google. It seems like the only difference is that things are grouped into categories. And the categories aren't even relevant. Look at a search for Arrested Development (http://blekko.com/#?q=Arrested%20Development http://blekko.com/#?q=Arrested%20Development) (one of the suggested searches on the homepage). Some links are categorized into "Movies", others "TV". Also, "Top Results" is for some reason second from the top.