2 ms·
> That is a nakedly emotionally manipulative reply with no substance. That is the effect I wanted to achieve in order to better parody and criticize parent's o
by johnchristopher 13y ago
> That is a nakedly emotionally manipulative reply with no substance.
That is the effect I wanted to achieve in order to better parody and criticize parent's own manipulative wording: "some" people, "sometimes", veiled attempt to accuse opponents of being "religious", etc. I thought it was more obvious, sorry.
Next time I'll just state it plainly like you did (no irony).
For what it's worth I couldn't find any numbers regarding the 70% loss and what it really refers to.
- jerf 13y agoHeh, yes, that never works. To be clearly a parody one must post something that would "obviously" never be posted seriously by someone. This turns out to be a high bar. Especially in emotional areas like environmentalism.