3 ms·
I think it's only acceptable if it's made very clear before you accept or decline the job offer. Otherwise it seems like it's taking advantage of people. The m
by nilkn 13y ago
I think it's only acceptable if it's made very clear before you accept or decline the job offer. Otherwise it seems like it's taking advantage of people.
The main reason I view it that way is because Facebook hires a lot of fresh college graduates who don't necessarily have much (if any) money saved up. To work for Facebook, they're going to have to find a place to live in one of the most expensive areas of the United States. I think it is quite disrespectful to put young people with little money in a situation where they are signing extended leases only to be let go within six weeks.
Granted, Facebook gives out pretty good signing bonuses, so that softens the impact a bit, but still if I knew that the first six weeks were effectively a probationary period I'd make a special effort to find a housing situation where I could pay on a monthly basis rather than entering a six- or twelve-month lease.
Moreover, if I had a family, I'd definitely think twice before going into a sort of six week interview, no matter who the company was. I wouldn't want to put my family through the difficulties of moving there only for me to get let go soon after arriving.
- masklinn 13y agoAn excellent point, I failed to notice that issue and completely agree. In EU contracts with probation periods the probation is explicitly spelled out in the contract (since labor laws allow for it but by no means mandate it), and generally discussed/mentioned during the interviews stuff.