3 ms·
> That's dishonest. You know quite well that, above, I was referring to the actress interviewed in the article under discussion, and, below, to Kardashian I'm
by detst 13y ago
> That's dishonest. You know quite well that, above, I was referring to the actress interviewed in the article under discussion, and, below, to Kardashian
I'm sorry. I honestly missed that. That was meant as evidence to support that you were in fact doing what i was describing. I mistakenly accused you of lying but it still seems the behavior fits (EDIT: not lying rather the behavior in the first paragraph of my original comment).
- leephillips 13y agoYou're piling more contemptible behavior on top of what you already did, while pretending to apologize. So you admit you were wrong, and have no evidence that I lied, but are tying to suggest that I'm a liar anyway with the ambiguous phrase "it still seems the behavior fits". Amazing. You know other people can see your comments, right? Not just me?
- detst 13y ago> while pretending to apologize No it was genuine. I don't think you lied at all and I apologized for it. > but are tying to suggest that I'm a liar anyway with the ambiguous phrase "it still seems the behavior fits". Re-read my original comment. The behavior I'm talking about is what is above the edit, not lying, but I can see how you would have that mistaken interpretation. I'm not having my best day with communication. > You know other people can see your comments, right? Not just me? Yes, I'm quite aware.