2 ms·
From what I understand, the original Sapir-Whorf thesis (now the strong version) was (correctly) discredited because it was about language limiting and determin
by david927 13y ago
From what I understand, the original Sapir-Whorf thesis (now the strong version) was (correctly) discredited because it was about language limiting and determining thought. The weak version, that it influences the way we think, is now widely accepted.
- aadsam 13y agoWidely accepted is stretching it. There are very few linguists who believe there's enough evidence to support the weak hypothesis.
- vortmeester 13y agoYou could rephrase the weak version to make it undeniable (if banal): the whole point of language is to influence the way others think! If I want to create thoughts in your brain, language is a pretty effective means. (I got this from Stephen Pinker's books.)