4 ms·
Should have gone for RTF. More widely supported.
by z92 13y ago
Should have gone for RTF. More widely supported.
- throwaway2048 13y agounfortunately RTF is not rigorously standardized, some basic elements of documents are, but lots of stuff is still adhoc, and not really suitable for an encompassing editable document standard.
- sigkill 13y agoOn the other hand I suddenly thought about HTML/CSS. I think HTML for reflowable and PDF for fixed would be awesome. The only thing is that you need a very good wysiwyg editor for html that's as good as word yet produces clean code.