4 ms·

This is idiotic. The requirement should be that the user can disable it entirely OR replace the private key. And it should require implementation of an optional

This is idiotic. The requirement should be that the user can disable it entirely OR replace the private key. And it should require implementation of an optional password protection.

Zr40 13y ago
That is actually the case. Point 17 states: Mandatory. On non-ARM systems, the platform MUST implement the ability for a physically present user to select between two Secure Boot modes in firmware setup: "Custom" and "Standard".
- krichman 13y ago
  My mistake. Carry on.