> their latest move to first pretend to support Wayland In November 2010 [1]. > and then mysteriously presenting Mir In March 2013 [2]. Technologies change.

> their latest move to first pretend to support Wayland In November 2010 [1]. > and then mysteriously presenting Mir In March 2013 [2]. Technologies change. The best path to follow can change. Switching paths over two years is surely acceptable and reasonable for any company. Claiming that Canonical "pretended" is false and misleading - or do you have any evidence of this? > Looking into the git contributions he is not even the one who contributed most! Others have already rebutted this: udev accounts for most other contributors, leaving Lennart for the vast majority of systemd. Do you have anything to say that isn't deliberately misleading? [1]: http://www.pcworld.com/article/210018/ubuntu_more_changes_bye_x_hello_wayland.html http://www.pcworld.com/article/210018/ubuntu_more_changes_by... [2]: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/03/05/canonical_mir_announcement/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/03/05/canonical_mir_announ...