4 ms·

What irks you about it?

• envex 13y ago
  It just seems a tad unnecessary. Why not use something like "2-cols/2-columns/pure-2"?
  • saltcod 13y ago
    I'd prefer something more explicit, personally. pure-row, pure-col-1-2.....
  • juandopazo 13y ago
    The idea is that you can combine columns of different sizes. If you want a column of 1/3 of the width and another of 2/3, then you just need to add pure-u-1-3 and pure-u-2-3. Maybe you're right and the "u" is unnecessary.
• devmach 13y ago
  There is too much options [0] and it's more flexible than it should be. I know , it sounds weird but with bootstrap all you have is 12 columns and when you have less options it's easy to plan. Maybe the other problem is : Units are not in multiplies of 5 and that forces you unnecessarily to think. If it would be in fixed units like bootstrap or in multiplies of 5 ( pure-u-3-25 etc.) i would be less thinking while deciding the length of some div. [0] : http://yuilibrary.com/yui/docs/cssgrids/#unit-sizes http://yuilibrary.com/yui/docs/cssgrids/#unit-sizes