3 ms·
No, not working for any of them. See my comment that it's still incorrect saying Lennart does all the work. You can easily check the git yourself, go ahead.
by buster 13y ago
No, not working for any of them. See my comment that it's still incorrect saying Lennart does all the work.
You can easily check the git yourself, go ahead.
- jeltz 13y agoWas there something wron with the methodology used in http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01365.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/05/msg01365.html which showed a 78% contribution from Pottering? Personally I do not see anything wrong with that, but 78% is basically doing all the coding.
- buster 13y agoWell, i did the same and came to vastly different numbers. It's easy to do: Do a git checkout and run git ls-files | grep -v udev | xargs -n1 -d'\n' -i git blame {} | perl -n -e '/\s\((.*?)\s[0-9]{4}/ && print "$1\n"' | sort -f | uniq -c -w3 | sort -n Even taking out udev shows Kay Sievers contributing nearly as much as Lennart. It also shows many other people contributing. That there is a main developer that does a lot of work is not something negative about a project, isn't it?!
- nknighthb 13y ago> i did the same No, you didn't. Your command line is not limited to source code, but includes, for starters, the massive hardware database checked in by Kay: 66888 hwdb/20-pci-vendor-model.hwdb 66185 hwdb/20-OUI.hwdb 49014 hwdb/20-usb-vendor-model.hwdb 6596 hwdb/20-acpi-vendor.hwdb You performed a fundamentally different and flawed test. > That there is a main developer that does a lot of work is not something negative about a project, isn't it?! You were the one who complained about Canonical not "working together", not me. I'm just holding you to your own standard.