3 ms·
Bitmesssage introduction
- oelmekki 13y agoI really like the concept, and it's surely something we need while apriori mass surveillance raises. I have a concern there, though. It's certainly better than any centralized network at a given time : high level encryption, no single point of failure, recipient hidden by broadcasting etc. But it also seems to me it's way simpler to store everything and wait until encryption can be broken. I understand data is supposed to be retained only 2 days and a half, but anyone could dump this data and store it indefinitely - and being p2p, it's way easier than asking google to give data. What if encryption can be broken in five years ? The person retaining data could immediately decrypt the whole of it. I'm not saying the idea should be drop, but that's something we have to consider, I think.