One thing that seems to be lost between the article and the comments - it's not just twentysomethings. It's twentysomethings "with cash on hand". That adds a d

One thing that seems to be lost between the article and the comments - it's not just twentysomethings. It's twentysomethings "with cash on hand". That adds a degree of self-indulgence to the description. It's not just twentysomethings solving the problems of people their age, tackling the questions of their generation, but solving the problems of (at least culturally) affluent, employed tech workers with disposable income.