3 ms·

I took a look at your reviews. But can you clarify what you mean with "mishandles symbolic links"? Thank you.

• stevekemp 13y ago
  Hard to draw ASCII here, but imagine a symlink from "/js/jquery.js" pointing to "/js/jquery-1.2.3.js". A good application will write output that has a literal copy of the numbered version, and a symlink point to it. Bad applications either ignore symlinks entirely, or change them to duplicate copies of files. (Which can be bad if you're considering a large file such as foo-latest-release.tar.gz.)
  • skrebbel 13y ago
    > Hard to draw ASCII here, .__ .___ __ .__ __ .__ |__| ____ __| _/____ _____/ |_ __ _ _|__|/ |_| |__ | |/ \ / __ |/ __ \ / \ __\ \ \/ \/ / \ __\ | \ | | | \/ /_/ \ ___/| | \ | \ /| || | | Y \ |__|___| /\____ |\___ >___| /__| \/\_/ |__||__| |___| / \/ \/ \/ \/ \/ _____ / | | _________________ ____ ____ ______ / | |_ / ___/\____ \__ \ _/ ___\/ __ \ / ___/ / ^ / \___ \ | |_> > __ \\ \__\ ___/ \___ \ \____ | /____ >| __(____ /\___ >___ >____ > |__| \/ |__| \/ \/ \/ \/