3 ms·
Why not?
by MatthewPhillips 13y ago
Why not?
- stdbrouw 13y agoBecause it excludes most forms of interactivity.
- twerquie 13y agoI disagree, many applications can be defined entirely in client-side code.
- rwinn 13y agoAfter looking it up I see it is commonly used to describe something that adds extra features to a browser, like flash or silverlight. Previously I took it to mean "rich in interactivity". That's what I meant when I originally wrote that, a static site does not mean you can't have interactive content. IMHO the best way to write webapps is to have a static client that consumes an API provided by a standalone backend.