4 ms·

I got scared when it said node.js, then I saw it was only using node.js for the customization part, not the hosting part and I got relieved. I really think the

by gnur 13y ago

I got scared when it said node.js, then I saw it was only using node.js for the customization part, not the hosting part and I got relieved. I really think they should emphasize that you can use your own web-server, using node.js to host a static site just doesn't make sense.

arnarbi 13y ago
It's titled as a "static site generator", which I think is clear enough.
risratorn 13y ago
The fact that it's static should mean you can host it on any platform that hosts static files. The technology only kicks in when you are writing blogposts and (re)generating your static files before you sync/upload them to your host.