4 ms·
If "they" are both the planters of the rootkit (taking over the computer) and the ones claiming to be wronged, looking for recompense, doesn't this create an un
by noonespecial 13y ago
If "they" are both the planters of the rootkit (taking over the computer) and the ones claiming to be wronged, looking for recompense, doesn't this create an unreconcilable conflict of interest as well as a worthless chain of custody for evidence of any wrongdoing? What would stop them from simply taking over computers, planting evidence and profitting (extorting) hugely?
I would think that once my computer spends any length of time not under my direct and exclusive control, I would no longer be solely liable for any actions that may have been taken with it. There would be huge doubt, no?
- deleted 13y ago[deleted]
- tantalor 13y agoAye, that's why real law enforcement have an oath of honor and are held to the standard of the constitution. Here they are asking to authorize vigilantism.
- nathan_long 13y agoThis is an excellent point. "We can only get $X per song in damages? Plant 100 songs on that computer."