3 ms·
I did my own tests with Google+. Some results: - Google+ queues images for recognition. Results improved steadily over 72 hours. - Google+ does not use OCR of
by neilk 13y ago
I did my own tests with Google+. Some results:
- Google+ queues images for recognition. Results improved steadily over 72 hours.
- Google+ does not use OCR of text in the images. That surprised me. But perhaps it's a privacy issue.
- Google+ does use information gleaned from elsewhere on the web. Words that were associated with the same images on Flickr would turn up those very pictures on Google+.
- Oddly, Google+ does not use information associated with those images on Twitter.
- Google probably uses EXIF data married to a database of location names.
- The much-vaunted feature recognition is impressive, better than any other system, but for me did not achieve creepy levels of intuition.
http://neilk.net/blog/2013/05/23/testing-google-photos-ai/ http://neilk.net/blog/2013/05/23/testing-google-photos-ai/
- kulkarnic 13y agoAnd it also doesn't seem to stem words. [flower] and [flowers] give different results (actually flowers gives no results). But I am impressed by the number of classes they have: who labels pineapples in an image corpus?
- neilk 13y agohttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Image_Labeler http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Image_Labeler