4 ms·

I think what those users mean is that they want the project on Github. There's no concept of "pull requests" within Git. Anyway, most Git users aren't Mercuri

by gamache 13y ago

I think what those users mean is that they want the project on Github. There's no concept of "pull requests" within Git. Anyway, most Git users aren't Mercurial refugees; I wager we're Subversion refugees and kids.

deleted 13y ago
[deleted]
- CmonNoReg 13y ago
  Which means (in most cases) "I did not do a conscious choice based on reviews and comparisons and just followed the hype.". A bit sad.
zalew 13y ago
> There's no concept of "pull requests" within Git. http://git-scm.com/book/ch5-2.html http://git-scm.com/book/ch5-2.html "run the git request-pull command and e-mail the output to the project maintainer manually." http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/05/torvalds_github/ http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/05/torvalds_github... "Git comes with a nice pull-request generation module, but GitHub instead decided to replace it with their own totally inferior version." > I think what those users mean is that they want the project on Github. that would be even worse. luckily as zzzeek explained below, it wasn't the case.
- gamache 13y ago
  Wow. I had no idea about git pull requests, so I even googled it, and didn't see it on page one. My mistake, thanks!